I think we also need to put in a lot more negative testing. I noticed
things like incorrect SCDL causes ambiguous error messages and NPEs.
In the vein, how exceptions are propagated and context added to them
could use some work as well.
Jim
On Sep 8, 2006, at 1:23 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I've published a coverage report for the kernel here:
http://www.buildtuscany.org/index.html
It is currently showing 63.7% coverage which I have to admit is
better than I expected and makes me optimistic that we can hit a
75% target for this release.
One of the big things pulling the numbers down is the constructors
on exceptions which aren't really an issue but which are also easy
to exercise if someone would like to help pull the number up.
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
