That's a shame. OK. I guess I'll have to do it the hard way and install
VC++ Express.
On 12/09/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino (JIRA) < [email protected]>
wrote:
>
> [
>
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-719?page=comments#action_12434304]
>
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-719:
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Hi Geoff,
>
> I tried your patch on Windows / VC++ express 2005 and got the same
> exception as before: incompatible list iterator
>
>
>
> > Exception in SDO runtime on Windows using VC++ Express 2005
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Key: TUSCANY-719
> > URL:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-719
> > Project: Tuscany
> > Issue Type: Bug
> > Components: C++ SDO
> > Affects Versions: Cpp-current
> > Environment: Windows and VC++ Express 2005
> > Reporter: Geoff Winn
> > Priority: Minor
> > Attachments: TUSCANY-jsd.patch
> >
> >
> > Here's the Exception and call stack I'm getting from sdo_test on
> > Windows, built with VC++ Express 2005:
> > msvcp80d.dll!104f9961()
> > [Frames below may be incorrect and/or missing, no symbols loaded
> > for msvcp80d.dll]
> > >
> >
>
tuscany_sdo.dll!std::list<commonj::sdo::rdo,std::allocator<commonj::sdo::rdo>
> > >::_Const_iterator<1>::_Compat(const
> > std::list<commonj::sdo::rdo,std::allocator<commonj::sdo::rdo>
> > >::_Const_iterator<1> & _Right={first=3452816845 second={...}
> }) Line
> > 309 + 0x17 bytes C++
> >
>
tuscany_sdo.dll!std::list<commonj::sdo::rdo,std::allocator<commonj::sdo::rdo>
> > >::_Const_iterator<1>::operator==(const
> > std::list<commonj::sdo::rdo,std::allocator<commonj::sdo::rdo>
> > >::_Const_iterator<1> & _Right={first=3452816845 second={...}
> }) Line
> > 290 C++
> > tuscany_sdo.dll!commonj::sdo::DataObjectImpl::~DataObjectImpl()
> > Line 4564 + 0x37 bytes C++
> > tuscany_sdo.dll!commonj::sdo::DataObjectImpl::`scalar deleting
> > destructor'() + 0x2b bytes C++
> >
> tuscany_sdo.dll!commonj::sdo::RefCountingObject::releaseRef() Line
> > 69 + 0x4c bytes C++
> >
>
sdo_test.exe!commonj::sdo::RefCountingPointer<commonj::sdo::DataObject>::~RefCountingPointer<commonj::sdo::DataObject>()
>
> > Line 133 + 0x15 bytes C++
> > sdo_test.exe!sdotest::scopetest() Line 69 + 0x19 bytes C++
> > sdo_test.exe!main(int argc=1, char * * argv=0x00386018) Line
48 +
> > 0x5 bytes C++
> > sdo_test.exe!__tmainCRTStartup() Line 586 + 0x19 bytes C
> > sdo_test.exe!mainCRTStartup() Line 403 C
> > The exception is raised in list.cpp - line 309:
> > #if _HAS_ITERATOR_DEBUGGING
> > void _Compat(const _Myt_iter& _Right) const
> > { // test for compatible iterator pair
> > if (this->_Mycont == 0 || this->_Mycont !=
_Right._Mycont)
> > {
> > _DEBUG_ERROR("list iterators incompatible"); <----
> There
> > _SCL_SECURE_TRAITS_INVALID_ARGUMENT;
> > }
> > }
> > This is called from DataObjectImpl::~DataObjectImpl():
> > PropertyValueMap::iterator i = PropertyValues.begin();
> > while (i != PropertyValues.end ())
> > {
> > unset((*i).first);
> > if (i == PropertyValues.begin()) <-- There
> > {
> > // unset has not removed the item from the list -
do it
>
> > // here instead
> > PropertyValues.erase(i);
> > }
> > i = PropertyValues.begin();
> > }
> > And I am a little puzzled by the code in the above loop...
Although I
> > didn't spend much time trying to grasp the logic here, and I have
not
> > been playing with C++ iterators too much lately, my experience is
that
> > removing entries from a collection that you're iterating on is
usually
> a
> > sure way to shoot yourself in the foot :) so I may be wrong but I
> sense
> > a bug somewhere in this loop...
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
administrators:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
> -
> For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
>
>
>
