Hi Greg,
Comments below.
On Sep 27, 2006, at 1:32 PM, Greg Dritschler wrote:
In the current implementation the thread switch for an asynchronous
method
invocation occurs after interceptors are given control. Isn't this
backwards?
Won't interceptors need to run on the dispatch thread to
establish transactional and security context, provide monitoring,
etc.?
I don't think so as context will need to be propagated to the thread
the dispatch is made on anyway. Also, the target may be a composite
reference in which case it could be in another VM. Keeping the thread
"switching" in the target invoker simplifies that case IMO.
Jim
Greg Dritschler
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
