Oops missed this.
Thanks for doing this! Yes, a utility class is probably a good idea.
Let me know what I need to do to get ScaWebApplicationContext in
since I have some internal uses of this right now.
Thanks!
andy
At 15:07 29/09/2006, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Sep 29, 2006, at 12:43 AM, Jim Marino wrote:
Andy,
I checked in most of your patch with a few mods to remove a
dangling clogging dependency in the poms and minor checkstyle
stuff. I didn't check in ScaWebApplicationContext as Jeremy has
some changes going on that we'll need to refactor to. I don't think
the samples will work quite yet until Jeremy's cleanup of the
webapp launcher is done. I figured this would be o.k. temporarily
since ScaWebApplicationContext is not referenced anywhere.
I had a look at ScaWebApplicationContext and Andy's version should
not conflict much. It looks like he turned some methods into statics
which had a trickle on impact into the test cases. I'm not keen on
making the same changes as having those utility methods on the
context listener doesn't seem very intuitive - perhaps we should add
a utility class.
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
