O.K. We'll need to move the testcases down to SPI as well then.
Jim
On Oct 5, 2006, at 10:31 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Hi Jim,
I had a quick conversation with Raymond about this. We basically
agree that we need to promote the function performed by
AbstractOutboundInvocationHandler to the spi as an extension point,
which is also option 2 in my response to him. This is also what his
statement means, ie, AbstractOutboundInvocationHandler is
"performing an invocation over an interceptor chain", to quote him,
and his proposal is to extract that to the spi.
Thoughts?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Marino"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 1:01 AM
Subject: Re: axis2 binding "compile" dependency on core
On Oct 4, 2006, at 9:58 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Ignacio.
I just found one of your patches added a "compile" dependency on
"core" to "binding.axis2". It's from
"Axis2CallbackInvocationHandler extends
AbstractOutboundInvocationHandler". I don't think it's
appropriate to have binding.axis2 depend on core. Can we fix it?
We had some discussions before to extract the invocation over
interceptor chain into SPI. It seems to be the right way to go.
Hi Raymond, could you explain what you mean by this?
Thanks,
Jim
Thanks,
Raymond
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
