Makes sense to keep the naming convention consistent across Tuscany.
On 10/5/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote: > <package>-1.0-incubator-M2 looks good for me. > +1 from me. > On 05/10/06, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> We need to choose a full name for the forthcoming release, so I've put a >> few >> suggestions below - any favourite? >> So far we've been referring to this release as M2 or Milestone 2 so all >> the >> suggestions below have M2 in them. >> We don't have the Maven restriction to start with a number, but we may >> want >> to follow the Java naming for M2 (1.0-incubator-M2), alternatively we >> could >> follow the names from the first C++ release: tuscany_sca_cpp- >> 0.1.incubating-M1 and tuscany_sdo_cpp-0.1.incubating-M1 >> >> Some alternatives are: >> tuscany_sca_cpp-1.0-incubator-M2 >> tuscany_sca_cpp-0.1.incubating-M2 >> tuscany_sca_cpp-0.2.incubating-M2 >> >> Any preferences/better ideas? Mine would be the first in the list to >> show >> that we are at a similar level to the Java side ;-). >> >> Cheers >> Andy >> >> > > -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
