[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-636?page=all ]

ant elder updated TUSCANY-636:
------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: Cpp-current

> Sca-core.xsd should define different types for composite/service and 
> componentType/service
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-636
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-636
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Specification
>    Affects Versions: Cpp-current
>            Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
>         Assigned To: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
>             Fix For: Cpp-current
>
>
> Sca-core.xsd defines a single Service complex type, trying to support both 
> <service> inside a <composite> and <service> inside a <componentType>.
> The problem with this approach is that composite / service is pretty 
> different from componentType / service. For example a composite service can 
> contain bindings, references to other services, an a multiplicty attribute. 
> Composite service looks to me more like a pattern of component than an actual 
> service definition. ComponentType / service does not allow for this pattern 
> at all. 
> The consequence is that the current  XSD cannot be used to validate SCDL 
> documents. To fix this I propose to have two different complex types to model 
> these two different things:
> - Service for ComponentType / service
> - CompositeService for Composite / service.
>     <complexType name="Service">
>         <sequence>
>             <element ref="sca:interface" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" />
>             <any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" 
> maxOccurs="unbounded" />
>         </sequence>
>         <attribute name="name" type="NCName" use="required" />
>         <anyAttribute namespace="##any" processContents="lax" />
>     </complexType>
>     <complexType name="CompositeService">
>         <sequence>
>             <element ref="sca:interface" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" />
>             <element ref="sca:binding" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
>             <element name="reference" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" 
> type="anyURI" />
>             <any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" 
> maxOccurs="unbounded" />
>         </sequence>
>         <attribute name="name" type="NCName" use="required" />
>         <attribute name="multiplicity" type="sca:Multiplicity" use="optional" 
> default="1..1" />
>         <anyAttribute namespace="##any" processContents="lax" />
>     </complexType>
> I also propose that we do the same thing for references.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to