All the other parts - 'dependency', 'name', 'version' - can be identical between Tuscany and Maven, but there's some subtle semantic difference that would be lost if Tuscany's 'group' was changed to 'groupId'? I don't get it.
...ant On 10/10/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 10, 2006, at 7:17 AM, ant elder wrote: > > I wonder if I'm going to be the only one that does a cutNpaste and > gets this > wrong, would it be so bad if it was the same? That doesn't mean it > has to be > the actual maven <dependency> element. IMO yes as it encourages lazy people to cutNpaste without thought leading to other more obscure errors when the semantic is different. It would be great to support Maven semantics using its elements - that would support cutNpaste and have it work too :-) Wouldn't be to hard to implement if you have the inclination. -- Jeremy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
