Kelvin - Thanks for setting up a JIRA (I am far from an open source expert, so feel free to provide explanations). I will work with members of our Infrastructure team to provide a couple of sample tests for Tuscany to assess. This might take us a couple of days as we will need to separate tests that exercise the SDO API from tests the exercise Rogue Wave (RW) implementation specific classes.
In addition to the actual tests, I think it would be wise if we make sure we are on common ground relative to the test framework -- for both Java and C++. I am not certain how we would best go about doing this, but a couple of items would include: *ensuring we are using the same tools. (we use JUnit and CxxTest) *what if any architectural documents for Java and C++ test suites exist --- if this is none - we might want to work togeher to build out the documents *can we work together to create test suite design? tom On 10/12/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tom, Welcome to Tuscany! that's great! Thanks for offering to get involved. How should we proceed? I'd be most happy to assist you to integrate what you have to offer. We currently have a small collection of tests using the junit framework (see https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/impl/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/ ) but there's significant scope for enhancement. BTW I'm going to make my response Java centric as Andrew has offered to help look at the C++ side of things. How about this for a proposal for how to proceed? I have opened a JIRA (this is our issue or bug tracking system if you are not familiar with these things --- please tell me if you are already an expert). The JIRA can be seen at http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-829 , and you can upload attachments to the JIRA, so we could perhaps use that to first attach a typical RogueWave test or two. I guess it's likely that there will be some modifications that need to be made with regards to setting up the test within our environment, but that way we could play and discuss how we might proceed with more tests. How does that sound? Best Regards, Kelvin. On 11/10/06, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > Coming from the C++ side of Tuscany, I know we'd certainly be > interested in those C++ SDO tests - please get involved! > > Cheers > Andrew > > On 10/11/06, T Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Kelvin - > > > > We at Rogue Wave have been developing an SDO product, HydraSDO, and have > a > > seires of tests that might be easiliy modified so as to exercise your > Java > > SDO product. We would be very interested in providing our tests as well > as > > helping create a test environment (unless this has already been done) to > > futher test the SDO product. Additionally, we also have C++ tests. > > > > > > tom gould > > ------------------------------- > > > > As the Java M2 release is imminent it occured to me that it would be > really > > useful if there are users out there who are putting our code through its > > paces that you may be developing samples/tests which could usefully be > > contributed back to the Tuscany project and make it more robust. If you > are > > in such a position it would be really great to hear from you. > > > > Regards, Kelvin. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
