OK... I've tested this and it works a treat. Is this an issue that you'd
like to see fixed in M2 release? We are about to re-spin so it can be
included.

Cheers.


On 19/10/06, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

forget that... I fixed up your patch

On 19/10/06, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Simon, what you have done there looks ok to me. However... the patch has
> hard-coded paths to yor c:\... eclipe directories in. Any chance you can
> create a friendly patch for me to apply and test?
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>  On 19/10/06, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >
> > I have created a patch for this problem (
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-873 ) which solves the
> > immediate
> > problem I have in PHP SDO and passes the PHP SDO tests that exist at
> > the
> > moment. However I'm not too comfortable with it because it is used by
> > numerous parts of data object API function which looks complicated
> > enough
> > already.
> >
> > What I have done is create a internal version of the
> > getPropertyIndex()
> > method called getPropertyIndexInternal() which creates a new property
> > in the
> > data object if the property doesn't already exist and the data object
> > type
> > is open. I use this new method whenever is seems that getPropertyIndex
> > was
> > used during the setting of properties. Can an C++ SDO expert take a
> > look at
> > this and see if this looks OK. Happy to discuss alternative
> > approaches.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Simon
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Pete




--
Pete




--
Pete

Reply via email to