Can this be a side-effect of : http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-754
- Luciano On 11/9/06, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Scott. Actually, LoginService amd ProfileService is not required to have the @DataType(name = "commonj.sdo.DataObject") because both interfaces only deal with simple java types. You should only apply @DataType to interfaces used by SCDL "interface.xxx" elements. Interfaces generated by SDO to reprepresent the data is not involved. Thanks, Raymond ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Kurz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 7:42 AM Subject: @DataType annotations in BigBank > Why does the annotation: > @DataType(name = "commonj.sdo.DataObject") > > appear on both the LoginService and ProfileService interfaces in the > BIgBank > sample, while it is commented out in the StockQuoteService? These > services > do not involve actual SDO DataTypes, right? > > It seems that it should be only needed on the AccountReport type which > would > be generated from a wsdl2java. > > Was it an oversight to leave this in? A best practice which has no real > effect? Or is this accomplishing something I'm missing? > > Thanks > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
