On 21/11/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote: > Go ahead and do this for linux. We can live without it building on > Windows > for a while as we change to use VS Express.. > > > 20/11/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to rename samples/BigBank to samples/CppBigBank (to indicate >> that it's the C++ version of the sample) and samples/RubyBank to >> samples/RubyBigBank (to indicate that it's the Bigbank scenario and not >> something else). >> >> If there's no objection I'll do that some time tomorrow. If the VC++ >> 2005 projects are already in place I'll take care of the rename there >> too. >> >> -- >> Jean-Sebastien >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > Done under revision r477787 and also renamed Calculator to CppCalculator to be consistent. I adjusted the Linux build, all the README and other doc files, as well as the Windows .bat and .cmd, but didn't touch the VC6 and VC7 projects. -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm creating Windows builds using VS Express and have checked in the projects under cpp/sca/samples/ides/VSExpress but I think this is wrong. If nobody objects I will have the build for e.g. CppCalculator in cpp/sca/samples/CppCalculator/VSExpress as this is more logical and equivalnt ot having the Linux Makefiles in the src tree. -- Pete
