I've created a JIRA component "Java SDO Compliance Test Suite".

I don't feel I have enough info to do much about putting a framework into
svn yet. Can we come to a consensus on the list some details like where it's
housed and what the base package name base is, etc.

At the top of this thread "test.sdo" was suggested as a package name;  Let's
assume this is OK unless anyone has any objections.

Currently we have the SDO spec code in  java/spec/sdo-api.  Is it
appropriate to make the test suite a peer of sdo-api?  e.g.
java/spec/sdo-cts?

What about future proofing for handling future spec revisions.  We have at
least a couple of instruments to do this with.  We could create a maven
subproject for the 2.1 level tests, so that a 2.0 project could be started
at some time.  We could build a spec revision level  into the package
names.  We could do both of those things.

Should I transfer in the contents of my sandbox containing the early test
code contribution from RogueWave?

Regards, Kelvin.

On 09/12/06, Dan Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Robbie,

Sounds like an interesting approach, some examples would be great :)

I was initially thinking we'd use junit v4 since it gets around some of
the
older limitations (eg. no longer needed to extend testcase). However this
does mean we'd be requiring Java 5, which may not be a good idea....

Kelvin, can you get a svn module setup and (presumably) a jira Component
so
we can start using jiras to track contributions etc...

What do you think ?

Thanks to all for positive responses,
Dan


Reply via email to