It depends on implementation, e.g. Tuscany C++ get(property) delegates to
get(int), and Tuscany Java get(int) delegates to get(property)
On 12/14/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Pete Robbins wrote:
> On 14/12/06, Yang ZHONG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> if (seqProperty.isMany())
>> {
>> int index = sequence->getListIndex(i);
>> dob =
>> dataObject->getList(seqProperty)[index];
>> }
>> else
>> {
>> dob =
>> dataObject->getDataObject(seqProperty);
>> }
>> might have an alternative:
>> dob = sequence->getDataObject(i)
>
>
> Correct. I recall making the same simplification in some code
recently...
> can't remember where though ;-) The code in CopyHelper and
> SDOXMLWriter use
> the longer method but I'm sure dob = sequence->getDataObject(i) will
> work.
>
> Cheers,
>
OK, Thanks! I had just blindly mirrored what I had seen in CopyHelper
for this :) This triggers another question: Is it more efficient to
access properties by index or by property object? In other words, should
I do dob->getXyz(i) or dob->getXyz(property)?
--
Jean-Sebastien
--
Yang ZHONG
