Jeremy,
I think where these should end up is dependent how the tools are
positioned within the Tuscany project.
While the wsdl2java tool currently generates interfaces with SDO
parameters, will there ever be extensions to support other data binding
types? Considering WSDL is a first class interface definition language
in the SCA space, it seems more natural to have these tools available in
that space with. Finally, I believe the SCA side of the tree has the
Axis2 dependencies while the SDO side does not. The last time I looked
at WSDL 2 Java it seemed to delegate most of the function to the Axis2
implementation and simply added a new emitter. Does it make sense to
introduce that dependency on the SDO side?
--
Matthew Sykes
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Looking at modularizing the tree, it seems to me that the tools and
java2wsdl/wsdl2java plugins don't actually have any dependency on SCA -
they are tools for generating java/wsdl interfaces with SDO DataObjects.
In light of that, I think they might be better off as part of the SDO
tree - does anyone have any issues with moving them there?
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
