Hi Luciano,
Is it working for you now ?
regards Hasan
On 1/3/07, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It should work now, as I changed it yesterday. Did you sync to the
> latest repo and clear out you local repo? Also, if there is more
than
> one service offered by the composite it the getService() method
will
> return null and a target not found exception should be thrown. It's
> possible I may have missed something so let me know if you still
have
> the problem.
>
> Jim
>
> On Jan 3, 2007, at 9:39 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>
> > Hi Jim, are you still working on this ? I'm getting the same
issue on
> > java/samples/sca/webapp
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> >
> > On 1/2/07, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> For now I specified the target service in the SCDL. I think
we should
> >> keep it like that in the sample as picking the default
service in a
> >> composite is fragile and not really best practice. I'll work on
> >> getting rid of the NPE in a bit as it is a fairly simple fix.
> >>
> >> Jim
> >>
> >> On Jan 2, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Jim Marino wrote:
> >>
> >> > Yes that's right. I'll fix it in a bit.
> >> >
> >> > Jim
> >> >
> >> > On Jan 2, 2007, at 10:30 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> I ran into a NPE with the latest code in the InnerComposite
> >> >> sample. Please see the stack trace below.
> >> >>
> >> >> java.lang.NullPointerException
> >> >> at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.hash
> >> >> (ConcurrentHashMap.java:172)
> >> >> at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get
> >> >> (ConcurrentHashMap.java:745)
> >> >> at
> >> >>
> >>
org.apache.tuscany.spi.extension.CompositeComponentExtension.getServi
> >> >> ce(CompositeComponentExtension.java:252)
> >> >> at org.apache.tuscany.core.builder.ConnectorImpl.connect
> >> >> (ConnectorImpl.java:616)
> >> >> at org.apache.tuscany.core.builder.ConnectorImpl.connect
> >> >> (ConnectorImpl.java:503)
> >> >> at
org.apache.tuscany.core.builder.ConnectorImpl.handleReference
> >> >> (ConnectorImpl.java:430)
> >> >> at org.apache.tuscany.core.builder.ConnectorImpl.connect
> >> >> (ConnectorImpl.java:90)
> >> >> at
> >> >>
> >>
org.apache.tuscany.spi.extension.CompositeComponentExtension.prepare(
> >> >> CompositeComponentExtension.java:368)
> >> >> at
> >> >>
> >>
org.apache.tuscany.spi.extension.CompositeComponentExtension.prepare(
> >> >> CompositeComponentExtension.java:370)
> >> >> at org.apache.tuscany.core.deployer.DeployerImpl.deploy
> >> >> (DeployerImpl.java:98)
> >> >> at
org.apache.tuscany.core.launcher.LauncherImpl.bootApplication
> >> >> (LauncherImpl.java:213)
> >> >> at org.apache.tuscany.test.SCATestCase.setUp
(SCATestCase.java:88)
> >> >> at innercomposite.InnerCompositeTestCase.setUp
> >> >> (InnerCompositeTestCase.java:31)
> >> >> at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:125)
> >> >> at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106)
> >> >> at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:
124)
> >> >> at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109)
> >> >> at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118)
> >> >> at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
> >> >> at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
> >> >> at
> >> >>
> >>
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.junit3.JUnit3TestReference.run(
> >> >> JUnit3TestReference.java:128)
> >> >> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run
> >> >> (TestExecution.java:38)
> >> >> at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests
> >> >> (RemoteTestRunner.java:460)
> >> >> at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests
> >> >> (RemoteTestRunner.java:673)
> >> >> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run
> >> >> (RemoteTestRunner.java:386)
> >> >> at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main
> >> >> (RemoteTestRunner.java:196)
> >> >>
> >> >> In this case, the qualified name for the target is the
component
> >> >> name and the portName is null and a NPE is thrown.
> >> >>
> >> >> The SCA spec defines the following syntax for wire-target-
URI:
> >> >>
> >> >> <component-name>/<service-name>
> >> >> o where the target is a service of a component. The
specification
> >> >> of the service name is optional if the target component
only has
> >> >> one service with a compatible interface
> >> >>
> >> >> If service-name is not present (portName==null), we should
check
> >> >> and pick the only one service. Am I right?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> Raymond
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
