Hello Angel, I don't feel in a position to compare the frameworks you mention, but I can comment on the state of the Java implementation and spec. Our support I would say is good, and a number of changes in the recent 2.1 spec have made things better and are filtering into the implementation, such as better support for open content, and handling of "." characters in property names. There are a few holes such as being able to handle attributes and elements of the same name, support for facets and validation, better handling of choice, but as I understand it these are going to be addressed to ensure that our support for schema is first class.
Regards, Kelvin. On 10/01/07, Angel Todorov < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello DEV Team, I would like to ask you some questions about tuscany's SDO impl - What is the current XML Schema support for SDO, and how does it relate to the schema support of binding frameworks such as xmlbeans, adb, jibx? Thanks very much in advance for the info. Regards, Angel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
