On Jan 10, 2007, at 6:50 AM, Mike Edwards wrote:
Jim,
I don't follow you. What would you expect the service name to look
like?
I especially dont want to see us making the simple case of a single
unambiguous interface look more complex. Can you draw up a sample
or two of what you mean?
I don't think there any issue with that case as because there is only
one interface it can be omitted:
locateService(MyInterface.class, "MyComponent");
The same rule also applies when wiring in SCDL as you know the
service contract on both sides:
<reference name="myRef">MyComponent</reference>
I'd also think this issue would apply to components using other IDL's
- for example, suppose the component implemented two WSDL interfaces
with the same local part but from different namespaces, wouldn't you
need to specify the full QName?
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
