I would lean towards providing an exucutable jar file and a structure that allows for vendors to have their own branch/pom.xml for vendor specific implementations ( static code, TestHelperImpl etc ) and a dependancy on the cts ( java/cts/sdo21 java/cts/vendorImpl/tuscany or something). However, I am not sure off the top of my head if that would work well with the surefire plugin for maven. I personally prefer and use ant so will ultmately just be pulling in the cts jar into my own build env.
Robbie On 1/9/07, Dan Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I would like to get people's thoughts on how we want to launch the SDO test suite. As you may have seen, an initial set of tests have been committed via jira 987 <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-987>. Since the tests are the "product" of the CTS suite, they are in the /src/main/ folder. As I'm sure you know this means that they will be built into a jar when the default mvn build is run. Currently the pom does not actually attempt to run the CTS against any implementation. Personally I think this is the right default behaviour, if it was to run the CTS against Tuscany by default it would add a dependency to tuscany and download it - which kind of goes against the idea of being implementation agnostic. However, people obviously do need to execute the CTS against an implementation. We can do this a number of ways: 1. Provide commented out sections in the pom.xml that when uncommented would run against a given implementation (with Tuscany as an example) 2. Provide seperate, alternative pom's that run against given implementations; for example mvn -f tuscany.xml to run against Tuscany 3. Provide an executable jar that contains a launcher such that a java -jar sdo2.1-cts-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar would execute the test suites (and leave it to the user to put an implementation on their classpath) 4. Provide a set of shell script to launch the tests (for Windows and unix/linux) My personal preference is 2 (and is seems easier than 3 & 4) but not sure if this approach would be acceptable for other implementations. Anyone got an opinion of how they would like to launch/execute the tests ? Cheers, Dan
-- * * * Charlie * * * Check out some pics of little Charlie at http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sets/ Check out Charlie's al crapo blog at http://robbieminshall.blogspot.com * * * Addresss * * * 1914 Overland Drive Chapel Hill NC 27517 * * * Number * * * 919-225-1553
