Yes, It's related to wire optimizations. I'll take a look.

Jim

On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:38 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:

I'm seeing it as well. It's probably caused by some changes in the core. I did a bit debugging, and here's the stacktrace where the code goes wrong: (OutboundWireImpl.targetWire == null for the EchoReference's outbound wire).

Jim, can you check?

Thanks,
Raymond

Thread [main] (Suspended)
OutboundWireImpl.getTargetService() line: 78
InboundWireImpl.getTargetService() line: 81
OutboundWireImpl.getTargetService() line: 82
WireObjectFactory<T>.getInstance() line: 70
PojoObjectFactory<T>.getInstance() line: 100
JavaAtomicComponent(PojoAtomicComponent).createInstance() line: 137
StatelessScopeContainer.getInstanceWrapper(AtomicComponent, boolean) line: 70 StatelessScopeContainer(AbstractScopeContainer).getInstance (AtomicComponent)line: 99 JavaAtomicComponent (PojoAtomicComponent).getTargetInstance() line: 129 JavaTargetInvoker.getInstance(short) line: 127 JavaTargetInvoker.invokeTarget(Object, short) line: 75 JavaTargetInvoker(TargetInvokerExtension).invoke(Message) line: 67 InvokerInterceptor.invoke(Message) line: 44 JDKInboundInvocationHandler(AbstractInboundInvocationHandler).invoke (InboundInvocationChain, TargetInvoker, Object[]) line: 45 JDKInboundInvocationHandler.invoke(Object, Method, Object[]) line: 122 $Proxy18.call(String) line: not available BootstrapTestCase.testDemoBoot() line: 35 NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Method, Object, Object[]) line: notavailable [native method] NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (Object, Object[]) line: 64 DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (Object, Object[]) line: 43 Method.invoke(Object, Object...) line: 615 BootstrapTestCase(TestCase).runTest() line: 154 BootstrapTestCase(TestCase).run Bare() line: 127 TestResult$1.protect() line: 106 TestResult.runProtected(Test, Protectable) line: 124 TestResult.run (TestCase) line: 109 BootstrapTestCase(TestCase).run(TestResult) line: 118 TestSuite.runTest(Test, TestResult) line: 208 TestSuite.run(TestResult) line: 203 JUnit3TestReference.run (TestExecution) line: 128 TestExecution.run(ITestReference[]) line: 38 RemoteTestRunner.runTests(String[], String, TestExecution) line: 460 RemoteTestRunner.runTests(TestExecution) line: 673 RemoteTestRunner.run() line: 386 RemoteTestRunner.main(String[]) line: 196----- Original Message -----From: "Bert Lamb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <[email protected]>Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 7:48 AMSubject: Re: Standalone Smoketest failure>I also just did a fresh checkout with a an empty local repo and I'm> getting a test failure for the echo binding:>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------> Test set: echo.BootstrapTestCase> ---------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.688> sec <<< FAILURE!> testDemoBoot(echo.BootstrapTestCase) Time elapsed: 1.64 sec <<< ERROR!> java.lang.NullPointerException> at echo.ClientImpl.call(ClientImpl.java:37)> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)> atsun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)> atsun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)> atorg.apache.tuscany.core.implementation.java.JavaTargetInvoker.invoke Target(JavaTargetInvoker.java:93)> atorg.apache.tuscany.spi.extension.TargetInvokerExtension.invoke (TargetInvokerExtension.java:67)> atorg.apache.tuscany.core.wire.InvokerInterceptor.invoke (InvokerInterceptor.java:44)> atorg.apache.tuscany.spi.wire.AbstractInboundInvocationHandler.invoke( AbstractInboundInvocationHandler.java:45)> a torg.apache.tuscany.core.wire.jdk.JDKInboundInvocationHandler.invoke (JDKInboundInvocationHandler.java:122)> at $Proxy20.call(Unknown Source)> at echo.BootstrapTestCase.testDemoBoot (BootstrapTestCase.java:35)> at echo.BootstrapTestCase.testDemoBoot (BootstrapTestCase.java:35)> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)> atsun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)> atsun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)> at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:154)> at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127)> at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106)> at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124)> at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109)> at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118)> at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)> at junit.framework.Te stSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)> atsun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)> atsun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)> atorg.apache.maven.surefire.junit.JUnitTestSet.execute (JUnitTestSet.java:210)> atorg.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTe stSet(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:135)> atorg.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute (AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:122)> at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:129)> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)> atsun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)> atsun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)> atorg.apache.maven.s urefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess (SurefireBooter.java:288)> atorg.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main (SurefireBooter.java:816)>> Any ideas? Are they related?>> -Bert>> On 1/15/07, Ignacio Silva-Lepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> After a full update, mvn clean of sca and mvn in sca I see the following>> failure:>>>>>> Running>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.runtime.standalone.smoketest.SmokeTestAssemblyC on>> tent>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.081 sec>> Running>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.runtime.standalone.smoketest.SmokeTestLauncher> > Tests run: 3, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.42 sec<<<>> FAI>> LURE!>> testLauncherUsage(>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.runtime.standalone.smoketest.SmokeTestL>> auncher) Time elapsed: 0.27 sec <<< FAILURE!>> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<usage: java[jvm- options] -jar>> laun>> cher.jar <jar> [args...]>> > but was:<java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/osoa /sca/SCA>> Exception in thread "main" >>> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:81)>> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:87)>> at>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.runtime.standalone.smoketest.CommandTestCase.c> > ompareOutput(CommandTestCase.java:37)>> at>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.runtime.standalone.smoketest.SmokeTestLauncher> > .testLauncherUsage(SmokeTestLauncher.java:40)>>>> testLauncherWithNoArgs(>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.runtime.standalone.smoketest.Smoke>> TestLauncher) Time elapsed: 0.13 sec <<< FAILURE!>> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<No Args>> > but was:<>>> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java: 81)>> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:87) >> at>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.runtime.standalone.smoketest.CommandTestCase.c> > ompareOutput(CommandTestCase.java:37)>> at>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.runtime.standalone.smoketest.SmokeTestLauncher> > .testLa uncherWithNoArgs(SmokeTestLauncher.java:53)>>>> Does anybody else see it?>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to