What was the resolution on the support question?

The old wiki is open to all registered users - why would we change that policy?
--
Jeremy

On Jan 23, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:

Hi, Dan.

The CWIKI site was set up recently with default permissions. Only users in the tuscany-committers group have "edit" access to the TUSCANY space so far.

1) I'll let the community decide what the appropriate access control we should have, please express your opinions.

Some seed questions:
a. What's the common practice set by ASF?
b. Should we open "edit" to committers or all of the registered users?

2) I can help update the ACL once we have a policy agreed.

Thanks,
Raymond

----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 2:47 AM
Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?


Hi,

I see the CWIKI site is up (http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/) but not open for public editing... shame 'cos I was hoping to write some stuff about getting started (I personally don't find the web site's getting started guide that great so thought that I'd have a bash on the wiki... c'est la
vie)

What's the plans now ? Is the CWiki only going to be open to tuscany
commiters - or anyone who is registered (as per existing wiki) ?

Cheers,
Dan

On 11/01/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

As the first step, I have filed a JIRA issue
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1107) to request to create a space for Tuscany on the CWIKI site. Once it's created, we can start to
play
with it and then decide if we should move.

Thanks,
Raymond

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?


>I like the idead of a single (wiki based) site; it would be better than > having the current problem of overlap between wiki and website - as per
> the
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ msg09447.htmlthread.
..
> If CXF have found it to work for them I think it would be a great
> plan
>
>
>
> On 06/01/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Jim Marino wrote:
>> >
>> > On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:08 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> >
>> >> For quite a while the Confluence wiki was not maintained by ASF >> >> infrastructure - it was very much use at your own risk. There may >> >> be >> >> enough people using it now that that may have changed but it would
be
>> >> worth finding out.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jeremy
>> >>
>> >> On Jan 5, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> Tuscany wiki is currently hosted at
>> >>> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany which is backed by MoinMoinWiki.
I
>> >>> personally found it's not very productive to work this wiki.
>> >>> Recently I tried Confluence wiki and it seems to be more
attractive:
>> >>>
>> >>> * Better look and feel and you can even customize the schemes
>> >>> * Easier to use, for example, CWIKI supports "Rick Text" editing >> >>> in
>> >>> addtion to "Wiki Markup"
>> >>> * Export to PDF/word/HTML
>> >>> * Comments
>> >>> * And more ...
>> >>>
>> >>> Apache has a CWIKI set up @ http://cwiki.apache.org/ confluence. >> >>> You
>> >>> can see more details at
>> >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CWIKI/Index. Quite a >> >>> few >> >>> projects use it to maintain their web sites and documentations.
>> >>>
>> >>> Should we request a space for Tuscany and migrate our existing
>> >>> contents over? We can take this chance to better organize our
>> >>> materials.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> Raymond
>> >>>
>> > I'd be in favor of this given Jeremy's point above. Perhaps we could >> > use CXF as a template to do this since it is very clean and nicely
>> > organized?
>> >
>> > http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF/
>> >
>> > Jim
>> >
>> >
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On a related note the CXF approach resolves the constant dilemma
between
>> 'Project home page' and 'Wiki', as their home page is a Wiki! It would >> be worth asking them what they think about the approach they've taken
>> and if they're happy with it and recommend it to others.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Sebastien
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------- -
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to