Thanks.
Skimmed it once (I'm still painting :-( ) but one thing jumped out
about the type system. In the contribution service I'm using RFC2045
Content-Type (aka IANA Media-Type) as the String describing the type
of the contribution as that is often available if the content is
being fetched over the web - would that be suitable for use as the
type here?
We may need to define our own for some things that are not
standardized yet.
--
Jeremy
On Jan 27, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I have a draft document @ http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
display/~rfeng/Artifact+resolvers (You need to register with Apache
CWIKI before you can view it). It's not fully updated to reflect
the latest deployment story in the SCA spec discussion.
Please review and comment.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeremy Boynes"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: Model changes to support separate contributions
On Jan 26, 2007, at 1:19 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
I have been looking into the artifact addressing and resolving.
I would like to contribute to this area once you have the two
new phases added.
Do you have anything you can send to the list for this? It would
be good be use it in the resolve phase.
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
