Hi Robbie, I'm working with Geoff to get those two applied... once they are we will have the peer project (1081 is the peer project structure - at least an initial one)... when applied it runs 328 (or something like that) tests & most of them pass :)
Hopefully more news by COB... Cheers, Dan One thing I'm wondering about is poms... currently CTS has a dependency on the tuscany parent pom - however to keep us 100% implementation independent we will need to copy some of the settings in this pom and then remove the dependency to the parent pom... unfortunatley when I just tried this my tests didn't run... so can't (currently) avoid the parent pom dependency.... On 30/01/07, Robbie Minshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi. Wondering what the schedule might be for commiting tuscany-1048 and 1081 ? Brian Murray has been making some fixes to his test cases here in our ant environement. We would like to work directly within maven and CTS but simply put developing using/creating patches is a little cumbersome. I am not sure if you woud prefer us to create a new patch with emerging changes or if we can wait for these JIRAs to be committed and then create additional patches from there ( my preference since 1048 is mostly a reorganization). Dan, any progress with creating a peer project for tuscany implementation. Let me know if you need me to find some time to do this. We have some other implementations of SDO interested in use/contribution and I would like to help them create there own version of the TestHelper based upon what we do for the Tuscany impl. cheers, Robbie -- * * * Charlie * * * Check out some pics of little Charlie at http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sets/ Check out Charlie's al crapo blog at http://robbieminshall.blogspot.com * * * Addresss * * * 1914 Overland Drive Chapel Hill NC 27517 * * * Number * * * 919-225-1553
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
