[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12469427
]
Hasan Muhammad commented on TUSCANY-1086:
-----------------------------------------
Frank,
Would you want the same for an ObjectOutputStream (i.e. scope defined ) ? I was
wondering why would anyone want to have a scope on both, since if at all one
wanted to use the same scope for serialization/deserializaton, then they would
use the global scope.. But still, wanted to ask if you thought we needed a
scope defined ObjectOutputStream as well ?
BTW, i am creating a new class called SDOObjectInputStream under
org.apache.tuscany.sdo.util.resource, just a placeHolder for the scope. This
would be returned by the create method.
Hasan
> Scope defined java serialiazation/deserialization of SDO
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-1086
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1086
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Java SDO Implementation
> Affects Versions: Java-M2
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Hasan Muhammad
>
> Need to have a scope defined java serialization/deserialization of SDO's.
> Currently it can be done only in the Global/default scope. Have to fix this
> by using helperContext as the scope for creating ObjectInputStream and
> ObjectOutputStream.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
