Perfect. Full speed ahead :-)
--- Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My comments > > >groupId: org.apache.tuscany > >artifactId:das > > This is already taken by the DAS subproject > /java/das... > What do you think about something like : > > groupId: org.apache.tuscany.das > artifactId:das.api > artifactId:das.rdb > artifactId:das.ldap > > artifactId:distribution > artifactId:samples > > In the future, we might need to have samples moved > to each impl, so > das.rdbwould have it's own samples, and > das.ldap would have it's own samples. > > Toughts ? > > > On 1/31/07, Ole Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm looking at creating the maven project for the > > das interfaces right now. > > > > I think > > groupId: org.apache.tuscany > > artifactId:das > > > > makes sense for the interfaces project. > > > > Then > > groupId: org.apache.tuscany > > artifactId:das.rdb > > artifactId:das.ldap > > > > for the datasource specific implementations. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Thanks, > > - Ole > > > > --- Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Yes, this would be the first step and you are on > the > > > right track, if we > > > identify others, we could continue moving them > > > gradatively... > > > > > > Another think to have in mind, and I don't think > I > > > have an answer right now, > > > is around the config model, and where is the > best > > > place for it : API > > > project, a common impl project , or each > particular > > > backend impl. Probably > > > API, if the models don't defer much. > > > > > > Any Toughts ? > > > > > > -- > > > Luciano Resende > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > > > > > On 1/30/07, Ole Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > OK - I think this is the trunk: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/das/rdb > > > > > > > > And I think these are the interfaces: > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 ole ole 1999 Sep 29 16:36 > > > Command.java > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 ole ole 3914 Dec 4 14:40 > > > > ConfigHelper.java > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 ole ole 2092 Oct 5 15:03 > > > Converter.java > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 ole ole 2103 Oct 5 15:03 > > > DASFactory.java > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 ole ole 2076 Sep 29 16:36 > DAS.java > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 ole ole 2154 Oct 5 15:03 > Pager.java > > > > > > > > Am I on the righ track? If so, I'll move the > > > package > > > > containing the interfaces to another maven > project > > > and > > > > > > > > submit it via JIRA? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > - Ole > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Trunk DAS is pretty stable, unless you find > any > > > > > problems with it, I'd > > > > > recommend staying with trunk. > > > > > > > > > > On 1/30/07, Ole Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Should I be grabbing das-java-M2? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, your CLA should be fine... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One of the first things that we will > need on > > > DAS > > > > > to > > > > > > > easily accommodate new > > > > > > > implementations would be to refactor the > DAS > > > > > > > Interfaces to it's own project > > > > > > > (e.g DAS API) and have the current DAS > RDB > > > > > having > > > > > > > that as a dependency, and > > > > > > > then DAS LDAP would also use DAS API as > > > > > dependency. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We would also need to enhance the API to > > > allow > > > > > > > instantiation of an specific > > > > > > > DAS impl. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As for design topics, some of the things > > > that > > > > > come > > > > > > > to mind : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Command syntax > > > > > > > - mapping filters to ldap > searches > > > > > > > - is there a standard syntax > for > > > CRUD > > > > > > > operations in ldap ? > > > > > > > - Support for change summary > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Luciano Resende > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/30/07, Ole Ersoy > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a CLA on file with the apache > > > directory > > > > > > > > project, so that probably applies for > > > Apache > > > > > in > > > > > > > > general right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK - Cool - I'll gather up some of my > > > design > > > > > > > notes, go > > > > > > > > through the RDB DAS info, so I > understand > > > how > > > > > that > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > done better, and try to come up with > > > something > > > > > > > inline > > > > > > > > with that for an LDAP DAS. If anyone > has > > > > > specific > > > > > > > > ideas I'll be glad to incorporate them > > > into > > > > > > > whatever > > > > > > > > design documentation produced. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > - Ole > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > === message truncated === ____________________________________________________________________________________ Have a burning question? Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
