[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Kevin Williams closed TUSCANY-1087.
-----------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Verified in revision:  502521

> DAS should not commit individual commands as part of applyChanges
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-1087
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1087
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Java DAS RDB
>    Affects Versions: Java-DAS-Mx
>            Reporter: Kevin Williams
>             Fix For: Java-DAS-Mx
>
>
> The DAS must commit all commands resulting from ChangeSummary processing as 
> an atomic unit.
> Sam Su's original note:
> "Hi kevin, thanks for you response.
> I debuged the application in Eclipse, I was sure that after user1  was
> inserted into database without an exception, a commit was performed on the
> connection.
> as two data objects needed to be inserted into database in my program,  from
> the DAS source code,  DAS will produce two different InsertCommandImpl
> instances for these two changes.The 'success' flag is in two different
> command instance, furthermore, it's a method scope variable, it can not be
> shared between two command instances. When command instance for user1
> execute without an exception, it will proceed to perform a commit on the
> connection,  command instance for user2 execute will throw an exception, so
> rollback. However the use1 has been already commited to database although
> use2 fail to be inserted into database."
> I have added a test "TransactionTests.estReadModifyApply()" t hat 
> demonstrates this defect.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to