By compiling with a jar that has Java 6 dependancy we are ourselves creating a dependancy on Java 6 for the SDO impl jar. This seems to be a problem to me. No ?
Robbie On 2/13/07, Yang ZHONG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sdo/impl/pom.xml declares dependency on stax-api, that's required to compile sdo impl. StAX impl will be required for runtime if StAX support code path is executed. On 2/13/07, Robbie Minshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Paul identified a problem in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1105 which appears to > indicate > that the sdo impl jar has dependancies upon Java 6 for some code paths. > This scneario is not limited to the CTS execution but should probably > present itSelf at least when using the > org.apache.tuscany.sdo.helper.XMLDocumentImpl.load code path. > > Paul points out that the issue is that the wstx-asl-3.2.0.jar and > stax-api-1.0.1.jar files are built using java 6 since they contain > references to javax.xml.stream.XMLStreamException which only exists in > Java > 6. > > The pom file indicates that stax is for optional features, and that > woodstax > is for testing purposes. > > Do we need these dependancies ? > > Should we use a different version of these dependancies ? > > What solutions do people suggest for resolving this issue ? > > cheers, > Robbie > > > > -- > * * * Charlie * * * > Check out some pics of little Charlie at > http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sets/ > > Check out Charlie's al crapo blog at http://robbieminshall.blogspot.com > > * * * Addresss * * * > 1914 Overland Drive > Chapel Hill > NC 27517 > > * * * Number * * * > 919-225-1553 > -- Yang ZHONG
-- * * * Charlie * * * Check out some pics of little Charlie at http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sets/ Check out Charlie's al crapo blog at http://robbieminshall.blogspot.com * * * Addresss * * * 1914 Overland Drive Chapel Hill NC 27517 * * * Number * * * 919-225-1553
