Hi, Jeremy.
Does your comment apply to the whole release or just the SCA spec jar?
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: Java Kernel Release
On Feb 19, 2007, at 3:45 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
Quick comment...
I'd suggest three release bundles (source):
* kernel
* runtime (which includes the three runtimes you mention above)
* core samples
with binary distributions of the standalone assembly plus maven
artifacts (including the war and itest plugins).
Don't you need to distribute the spec jars as well ?
Yes, and I think we should have stricter release criteria for these
as well. Specifically:
+1 I have compared the candidate to the spec and have not found any
discrepancy[1]
+0 I have reviewed them but have not done a detailed comparison to
the spec
-1 I have compared the candidate to the spec and have found a
discrepancy
with any -1 being a veto.
Thoughts?
--
Jeremy
[1] defining discrepancy the same way Sun do for signature
verification for API jars (i.e. nothing added, nothing removed)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
