[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12474717
 ] 

Geoff Winn commented on TUSCANY-1073:
-------------------------------------

Yes, that is what I was thinking. My assumption was that you don't really need 
the whole of XMLSchema.xsd. Obviously it would be better to just load that and 
be done with it but since that isn't possible right now, I was hoping that we 
could create what you need ourselves, within the limits of the current SDO 
implementation.

> Not currently possible to generate WSDL - specifically schema - using SDO
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-1073
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1073
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: C++ SDO
>    Affects Versions: Cpp-M3
>            Reporter: Matthew Peters
>             Fix For: Cpp-M3
>
>
> When I tried to use SDO to generate some wsdl containing a <types> element 
> with some schema, I found that I could
> not generate the contents of the schema, specifically those things that are 
> in the schema namespace. I can't remember
> quite what happened - either the necessary elements were not in the model or 
> not written out, but Ed Slattery explained to me
> at the time that anything in the schema namespace is ignored.
> Please could you fix this so that I can generate wsdl with embedded schema? I 
> currently have a bodge where I have to
> generate all the schema part of my wsdl by hand - lots of string handling - 
> and then stick it into the wsdl at
> the appropriate point and it is all a bit horrid. Fixing this would help a 
> lot.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to