I think we should use JDK logging as the default to minimize the
dependencies :-).
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 11:58 PM
Subject: Re: Monitoring support in the standalone server
On Feb 20, 2007, at 10:01 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
I temporarily added support for monitoring using JDK logging in the
standalone server. I'd like to change this to using log4j as the
default. What do people think?
I thought you didn't like additional dependencies? :-)
I agree we should add a MonitorFactory for log4j but are the advantages
enough that we should make it the default?
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
