Is anyone else going to be reviewing these or should I start to prep for a release? -- Jeremy
On 2/26/07, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 25, 2007, at 9:24 PM, Jim Marino wrote: > > On Feb 25, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Jim Marino wrote: > >> >> On Feb 25, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Jim Marino wrote: >> >>> >>> On Feb 25, 2007, at 1:23 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: >>> >>>> I've been through the sca-api-r1.0 classes and tried to bring >>>> them in line with the specification, including applicable >>>> errata :-) Apart from one issue with @Property I think they are >>>> now in alignment. >>>> >>>> It would be good if a couple of other people could review these >>>> so we can release them. >>>> Any volunteers? >>> I'll volunteer although I'm not the best person to do it in terms >>> of being a fresh set of eyes. Also, I'm a bit concerned about the >>> extensions related to DataTypes being in there. I think it is >>> critical we have this information but not at the expense of >>> violating the spec. If people agree, I will volunteer to go in >>> and provide an alternative today that uses a Tuscany API. >>> >>> Jim >>> >> >> Provisional +1 assuming the @Property#override and >> @Property#xmlType are fixed. >> >> Jim >> > > In r511727 I removed the @Property#override and replaced it with > the use of @Property#required where appropriate. > > Jim > I changed the kernel to support @EndConversation and I see Jeremy has removed @Property#xmlType so +1 for the release. Jim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
