[snip]
Dan Murphy wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
On the move SCDL files... where were you planning to move them to
(META-INF/scdl, or up futher into the main/resources part of the
source tree
?)
Just asking so I can keep in sync with you and do the same for my
intended
databinding tests (incidently I also adoped the
composite-name.composite for
default binding and composite-name.composite.ws for the same composite
with
a web service binding... does this still make sense, or are you also
changing the iTest framework so I could no longer use this approach ?)
Cheers,
Dan
src/main/resources/<composite-name>.composite
The runtime should be able to work with any file name, but I recommend
to use a single .composite extension to avoid confusion and allow people
who are using IDEs to associate .composite files with the correct XML
editor and validate them with the SCDL XML schema.
I also recommend to use different composite names for different
composites, to avoid collisions later when you include these composites
in an SCA domain.
Finally, I am not making changes to the iTest framework/plugin. I am not
using it as I've not found it useful for what I had to do.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
