Folks,
I only saw this discussion recently, since I was heads-down with the SCA
1.0 specs for the past month.
The www.osoa.org site is wholly based on using the Confluence Wiki and
our experience with it is good. You can pass your own judgement on how
good the www.osoa.org site looks ;-) but it did not take much effort
to do. It is easy to create sub-portions of the site as well - we have
about a dozen running now.
There are quite a few off-the-shelf features and plugins and they are
maintained - Confluence is a commercial product with a development team
behind it.
Yours, Mike.
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
Tuscany wiki is currently hosted at http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany
which is backed by MoinMoinWiki. I personally found it's not very
productive to work this wiki. Recently I tried Confluence wiki and it
seems to be more attractive:
* Better look and feel and you can even customize the schemes
* Easier to use, for example, CWIKI supports "Rick Text" editing in
addtion to "Wiki Markup"
* Export to PDF/word/HTML
* Comments
* And more ...
Apache has a CWIKI set up @ http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence. You can
see more details at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CWIKI/Index. Quite a few
projects use it to maintain their web sites and documentations.
Should we request a space for Tuscany and migrate our existing contents
over? We can take this chance to better organize our materials.
Thanks,
Raymond
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
