On Feb 28, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
We've had a couple of users recently talk about issues running
samples etc. many of which would go away if there was a release
available for them to use. I think we should do a release from trunk.
This would include:
* the 1.0 spec jars
* kernel
* runtime (including war and itest plugin)
* core-samples (source only)
I'll start to pull together the necessary artifacts for us to vote on.
--
Jeremy
For versioning the SCA jar, how about: 1.0-incubating? For kernel,
runtime, and the samples, I think it should be something with
"alpha". Since a lot of refactoring and new features have been
introduced, perhaps we call it 1.0-alpha-incubating or 2.0-alpha-
incubating?
As a rule of thumb, my preference is for the major version of the SCA
jar to correspond with the spec. We may want to rev the minor spec
version for bug fixes. For kernel and runtime, however, I don't think
the major version should be tied to the SCA spec version as there
will be many cases where we want to have a release that does not
correspond to a spec revision or have spec-specific features.
After these releases, I'd also like to start independently releasing
some of the extensions such as Spring, JPA, and DataSoruce. Meeraj
mentioned he is interested in getting Groovy out as well.
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
