On 3/8/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, FYI, we already have two cross-databinding integration tests added by Rick for the purpose of business exception handling. They use the SDO, JAXB and AXIOM databindings. iTest-exceptions-crossBinding (component (SDO) to component (JAXB)) iTest-exceptions-crossBinding-ws (component (SDO) to reference w/ ws binding (AXIOM)... soap/http ... service w/ ws binding (AXIOM) --> component (JAXB) Hopefully they give you some ideas. Thanks, Raymond ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 3:32 AM Subject: Re: Databindings test status > Hi Simon, > > Essentually, as I see it, there are two main activities: > > - Increase the types of data. The sample is just a trivial complex > type, we should also test more complex data strucutres using either (or > both) the SDO schemas (in the CTS & SDO Impl) and the interop tests > (which I > think you were one of the main authors of). > - Add tests for interop between databindings > > In doing so I think we now need to test different styles of ws bindings. > Since we need to generate the wrappers for doc/lit wrapped style ws > binding, > it means that we should also test rpc and straight doc/lit style as they > could effect the way databinding transformations behave. > > I should be adding a patch for the first interop today (or tomorrow), so > if > you wanted add different ws binding styles to the current example that > would > be a good place to start. > > Thanks for you offer of help, > Dan > > On 08/03/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On 3/7/07, Dan Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > Seems like Raymond generates the SDO representation of the wsdl as well >> as >> > the data in the the XSDs. This seems to be due to the use of wrapped >> style >> > of ws binding (or is it always necessary ?). Interesting thought that >> this >> > is required, personally I'd not have guessed it would be needed as I'd >> > assumed the wsdl is the domain of (transport) bindings rather than >> > databindings. >> > >> > Would like to make a couple of minor tweaks to what Raymond did >> (generate >> > the SDO objects in a non-default package) so we can do sdo<->jaxb >> between >> > client and service >> > >> > Thanks for helping chaps, >> > Dan >> > >> > On 07/03/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > > On 3/7/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > If you try with the very latest SVN code both the JAXB and SDO WS >> > tests >> > > > should work now as Raymond made so fixes over night (works for me >> > now). >> > > > >> > > > I don't think the tests using the default binding will work right >> now >> > as >> > > > there's no default binding implemented yet. >> > > > >> > > > ...ant >> > > > >> > > > On 3/7/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi Dan, I've just spent a couple of days stepping through the SCA >> > code >> > > > and >> > > > > trying various tests to build up my knowledge a little. I note >> > > > > the >> > > > > databinding tests are being updated and you are asking for some >> help >> > ( >> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1149). I just >> updated >> > > from >> > > > > SVN >> > > > > (for the integration branch) and ran up your tests and get the >> same >> > > > > result, >> > > > > i.e. the JAXB/WS combination passes while the other three fails. >> By >> > > way >> > > > of >> > > > > education for me I'm going to have a crack at debugging and see >> how >> > I >> > > > get >> > > > > one. Have you already solved this problem? Anything I should >> > > > particularly >> > > > > look out for in terms of configuring and debugging the tests? >> > > > > >> > > > > Simon >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > Hi Ant >> > > >> > > Yes, thanks, I just discovered that. I went back and did a mvn clean >> and >> > a >> > > rebuild and now I see both the sdo and jaxb ws tests working now. >> > > >> > > Simon >> > > >> > >> Dan >> >> By way of education am just digging into what gets generated and used in >> your sample so I will be back here with questions shortly:-) >> >> From your comments you have tests in mind. Clearly there are various >> combinations of message, databinding and binding that we could test. We >> did >> some work a while back on interop schema that we could use and there is >> all >> the work in CTS. Can you give me a quick run down on what you plan. I can >> help write tests. >> >> Regards >> >> Simon >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Raymond, Thanks for pointing that out. These are good examples. We want to
do the same but with more data types:-) Simon
