[snip]
Luciano Resende wrote:
Hi Raymond
1) What's the naming convention for test suites? Should we name them as
"*TestSuite.java"? If so, we have to adjust the surefire inclusion
pattern
in pom.xml to recognize the test suites. If we're fine with names
such as
"*AllTestCase.java", then the current pattern can work as-is.
I think *TestSuite.java would make more clear the testcases that had
migrated to the suite notation used by JUnit 4.2. Off course, if it's
a lot
of changes to support the name pattern change in the surefire plugin,
I'd be
ok with *AllTestCase.java.
+1 for TestSuite
2) For those test cases intended to be run as part of a suite, I
guess we
should name them as something like "*Test.java" which doesn't match the
surefire inclusion pattern. This way, these test cases will not be
run out
of the suite. Right?
+1
+1, I tried and if you leave them as *TestCase they are run twice, so
yes *Test.java makes sense to me.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
