On 15/03/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ant elder wrote: > > I was using libxml2 2.6.27, seeing you had 2.6.24 i went looking for > that > > but can't find a pre-compiled win32 version for that, so I tried > > 2.6.23 and > > using that the sample runs fine. > > > > ...ant > > > > Would it help to have on our Wiki a page with actual links to the > (Windows) dependency downloads that people have been successful with? > This way users won't have to fish for distributions of libxml for > example that work for us. > > What do you think? Sure that would be useful but IMHO even better would be to just distribute these dependencies with the binary distro. I know not everyone agrees with that though. ...ant
I really think that is a bad thing to do even considering the License issues of re-distributing some of them. -- Pete
