[snip]
Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Kernel Alpha2 Release
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:35:56 -0700
[snip]
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I like the timing - about a month, 6 weeks at the most is a good
window between releases in early stages like we are.
+1 from me
I agree federation is the big delta between now and then - we should
have by then
* federated classloading (with multi-classloader support)
* federated scope
* the changes done for separating controller and physical runtime
* contribution store and artifact redistribution
It would be good to increase the spec coverage e.g.
* support for casting between proxies and service references
* support the new Conversation API
* clean up around complex properties - specifically being able to
use an external file to configure the server runtime
* some more integration tests
Yes it will be good to increase the spec coverage. Adding to your
list, I'd also like to support things like:
- Ability to override service/reference/property configuration at the
componentType/component/composite level.
- More coverage of the SCDL 1.0 syntax with things like qnames on
composites, or composite resolution without requiring a scdlLocation
attribute for example, I think we need to do some work to bring our
SCDL model in sync with the latest revision of the spec.
- Complex and multi-valued properties (I think Venkat has done some
work in that area that could be included too)
- Support for both WSDL and java interfaces and mapping between the two
I can also help bring over some of the integration tests from the
integration branch.
Also, user support such as:
* the composite plugin (i.e. pick an archive type)
* JUnit4/TestNG support in the itest plugin
* contribution tool (command line and plugin?)
* a start on some form of console
* some more samples
* doco for all the above
This looks good to me, I also want to have a very minimal runtime
that will work without a Tuscany launcher.
There is already support in the runtime for standlone server other
than the laucher with some basic JMX management.
I've seen it. Thanks. The standalone server is nice, but I'm looking for
a client, similar to what we had in Tuscany M1. I want to be able to
write the main method of a client program, set up the Tuscany
environment myself from the main method, and start that program like any
other Java program without a specific launcher, from the command line
with java.exe, from an IDE, etc.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
