Brian, There is already spec discussion about possibly deprecating the DataGraph interface entirely. Even if that doesn't happen, I think that the (URI, name) methods should be deprecated.
Frank. "Brian Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/20/2007 10:28:29 AM: > Thanks Kelvin. > > That is a workaround for the example I provided. However, the absence of > HelperContext as a parm does seem to render createRootObject(URI, Name) and > DataGraph.getType(URI, name) of very limited use. > > The DataGraph methods are different from the following: > DataObject.createDataObject(propertyName, URI, name) > DataObject.createDataObject(propertyIndex, URI, name) > in that a user of these DO methods would subsequently use a TypeHelper or > XMLHelper - which is where the HelperContext comes into play. (i.e. I > would not think that HelperContext should be a parm to these functions.) > > It may be that the answer is simply - Don't use the DataGraph (URI, name) > methods. However, this seems to me to be an excellent opportunity for user > error. Should I start a thread on the spec side for this topic? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
