On 3/21/07, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 21/03/07, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 20/03/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/20/07, Geoffrey Winn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I've downloaded the SDO src distribution on XP and it builds and runs as > > > advertised. > > > > > > +1 from me. > > > > > > Geoff. > > > > > > On 20/03/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > ...ant > > > > > > > > On 3/16/07, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Please vote to approve the release of milestone 3 of Tuscany SCA > > > Native > > > > > and > > > > > Tuscany SDO C++. > > > > > > > > > > The SDO release includes performance improvements (30-40%) along with > > > > > improvements to robustness. > > > > > The SCA release includes support for C++, Python and Ruby languages > > > and > > > > > sca, > > > > > webservice and REST bindings. > > > > > > > > > > The distribution artifacts are here: > > > > > > > > > > - linux and Mac OS X (source only) - > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/M3-RC4/linux-macosx/ > > > > > - windows (source and binary) - > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/M3-RC4/win32/ > > > > > > > > > > The RAT tool output for the release artifacts is here: > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/M3-RC4/ > > > > > > > > > > The SDO release is tagged here > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/cpp-sdo-1.0.incubating-M3-RC1/ > > > > > The SCA release is tagged here > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/native-sca-1.0.incubating-M3-RC4/ > > > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Pete > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pete > > > > I installed the new RCs on my Fedora Core 6 box this evening > > > > +1 for SDO > > > > I still get this strange effect with SCA where scagen inserts URL encoded > > strings from the scagen XSL into generated CPP files. I have the IBM > > java2-i386-50 JDK installed. Has anyone else tried with that? I might try > > with a different version and see if that has the desired effect. > > > > Regards > > > > Simon > > > > Sorry Simon I've never seen anything like this on any of my 3 systems > with various Java SDKs. Not sure I've tried with that IBM Java though. >
I think I have seen this on my Linux system when I tried using the IBM JDK 5 a while ago - I reverted to JDK 1.4.2 and it works fine. Have you tried an earlier JDK Simon? We should raise a jira & add this to the readme I guess. Cheers Andy
