Ant, perhaps that is the question. I certainly don't think this is a substantial contribution, but who can confirm that?
Frank. "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/21/2007 02:53:10 PM: > I think it may not be completely clear to everyone yet why this code does > not have to follow the IP clearance process as described at: > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ > > From that link it doesn't seem completely clear when you need to follow the > IP clearance process or when a code attached to a JIRA can be treated just > as any other patch from a community member. Is the question whether or not > these two classes "represents a substantial contribution"? > > ...ant > > On 3/21/07, Frank Budinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I believe this issue is resolved. I spent a good part of the last two days > > chasing this down with the Lawyers to alleviate Jeremy's concern. > > > > Does anyone other than Jeremy believe that this issue is not already > > resolved? If so, can you please explain exactly what else I need to do? > > > > Thanks, > > Frank. > > > > > > > > > > Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 03/21/2007 01:56 PM > > Please respond to > > [email protected] > > > > > > To > > [email protected] > > cc > > > > Subject > > Re: SDO IP Issues, was: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 21, 2007, at 10:27 AM, Frank Budinsky wrote: > > > > > Jeremy, I don't understand your last comment: > > > > > >> I can't ack this for the ASF - that has to be done by an Officer as > > >> described in the IP Clearance process. They would probably want > > >> something official from IBM (Software Grant). > > > > > > By attaching the two files to the JIRA, and selecting the "Grant > > > license > > > to ASF ..." button, I (on behalf of IBM) am contributing the > > > classes. If I > > > didn't have the right to do that, I would obviously be personally > > > liable. > > > How is this contribution different from any other contributed source > > > files? > > > > It isn't. And Apache has a IP Clearance process for handling them. > > Please don't shoot the messenger. > > > > > > > > What I was specifically asking is whether there is some stringent > > > timeline > > > issue that I still need to deal with? The code had been in SVN > > > before the > > > license was officially granted. > > > > The big one is that we can't release this code until this resolved. > > -- > > Jeremy > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
