I'm looking into revising samples.

On 3/22/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Looking back at the samples, it's clear they haven't been significantly
revisited since M2 at the 2.0.1 level.  It's going to take a little time
to
put these straight.  They have also been affected by generator template
bugs
which are now being fixed,  so this will sort the issues that Yang pointed
out.

Regards, Kelvin.

On 20/03/07, Yang ZHONG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Agree with Ant, we probably don't need jUnit into the binary distro.
> At the same time, do we really need ASM?
>
> On the other hand, roughly I see 2 kinds of audience:
> 2-1. developers who participate in development. I guess they might lean
to
> work upon the source repository instead of the release
> 2-2. users who don't participate in development yet. I guess they
concern
> binary distro much more than the source counterpart
> If users are the majority of the *release* audience, it'll be nice to
make
> sample build easy against binary distro.
> Currectly, I have to do some work to build sample.
>
> I see some errors running the samples:
> 1. NullPointerException @ CreateDataObjectFromXmlString.java:153
> 2. ClassCastException @ ObtainingDataGraphFromXml.java:156
> 3. NullPointerException @ PurchaseOrderControl.java:438 (option 13)
>
> On 3/15/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/15/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have posted an SDO Java M3 release candidate here:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/M3/RC1/<
> > > http://people.apache.org/%7Erobbinspg/M3-RC1/>
> > >
> > > Please take a look at this and try it out, so that I can pick up any
> > > errors
> > > quickly and move towards a vote on a proper release in the short
term.
> > >
> > > Thanks, Kelvin.
> > >
> >
> > Looks pretty good to me. The binary distro includes JUnit, do you
really
> > need that? If so you need to add it to the LICENSE and NOTICE files.
> Also
> > should probably include the ASM copyright in the NOTICE file.
> >
> >   ...ant
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Yang ZHONG
>




--

Yang ZHONG

Reply via email to