Sorry, my bad... the DynamicTypesFromSchemaTestCase will still fail - see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1178 but the approach in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1181 could be used to fix this also (also should have read 1181 in above update, my memory fails me :)
Cheers, dan On 28/03/07, Dan Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Luciano, Once the patches are applied I believe all these errors should go... The XSDSerializationTest is renamed by the patch for 1175 (from memory I think that's the right one). We then also need to decide on all the ones we want in the adopted suite (since there are over 300 tests now) Cheers, Dan On 28/03/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What is the current status of CTS testcases ? I'm getting the following > issue... > > ------------------------------------------------------- > T E S T S > ------------------------------------------------------- > Running test.sdo21.vendor.tuscany.tests.AdoptedCtsTestSuite > default null > Tests run: 26, Failures: 5, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.493sec > <<< FAILURE! > > Results : > > Failed tests: > testDefineWithNoLocation(test.sdo21.tests.general.XSDSerializationTest > ) > testDuplicateDefineWithLocation( > test.sdo21.tests.general.XSDSerializationTest) > testDynamicTypesGroup0( > test.sdo21.tests.api.DynamicTypesFromSchemaTestCase > ) > testDynamicTypesGroup1( > test.sdo21.tests.api.DynamicTypesFromSchemaTestCase > ) > testDynamicTypesGroup2( > test.sdo21.tests.api.DynamicTypesFromSchemaTestCase > ) > > Tests in error: > testGetInstancePropertiesSize( test.sdo21.tests.api.DataObjectTest) > > Tests run: 26, Failures: 5, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0 > > > On 3/28/07, Dan Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > There are a number of patches we could do with being applied to the > CTS... > > is anyone available to apply then ? > > > > Specifically 1181 & 1175 seem fine and there are also patches > submitted > > for > > most others in this component. > > > > Assuming the approach in 1181 is acceptable then maybe we could do the > > same > > for 1176 - WDYT ? > > > > PS. Thanks to Luciano for appyling Tuscany-1195 last night.. > > > > Cheers chaps, I'll get back to my building work now :) > > Dan > > > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende<http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> >
