This is an indication that the vote was initiated prematurely, before
agreement was reached. I would suggest withdrawing it until
individuals' concerns have been addressed unless we think this issue
is irreconcilable and that a decision should be forced.
--
Jeremy
On Mar 28, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Jim, Meeraj,
If the stream of -1's contnue, am afraid there isn't going to be a
single release at all.
thx,
dims
On 3/28/07, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 28, 2007, at 12:51 AM, ant elder wrote:
> Here's the vote on this I said [1] I'd start to get closure on this
> issue.
>
> The proposal is to have top-level pom for the Java SCA project that
> enables
> building all the modules together - kernel, services, runtimes,
> extensions
> etc, and for that to work all those modules need to use the same
> version
> name.
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> ...ant
>
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/
> msg16024.html
There has been no proposal for how to resolve the issue about
building extensions using multiple versions of kernel and how modules
on different release schedules requiring different levels of kernel
or plugins will be handled.
Until we can come up with a solution for these issues, I feel I have
to vote against the proposal.
-1
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services
Developers
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
