But we probably want to release 2 things, sca-spec and sca, right ? and then in subsequent releases of sca, we are only going to release sca, unless the spec changes and we need to update sca-spec jar.
On 4/5/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote: > Good points. I agree it's probably better to keep it at sca/spec level. > > Thanks, > Raymond > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Venkata Krishnan" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 10:15 AM > Subject: Re: Build update, was: SCA source tree and build structure > > >> Yes and I very faintly remember this to be the reason why we moved >> the specs >> out to where it is now. Isn't it ? >> >> - Venkat >> >> On 4/5/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> I was under the impression that the spec-sca-api-r1.0 module would be a >>> stable one unless the spec changes. Isn't right that, under spec/ we >>> can >>> have multiple sca releases based on the same spec-sca-api-r1.0, but >>> moving >>> it to /modules we will be forced to have a spec api release every >>> time we >>> release sca ? >>> >>> On 4/5/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > For SCA, I suggest that we further move it to > >>> "modules/spec-sca-api-r1.0 >>> ". >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Raymond >>> > >>> > ----- Original Message ----- >>> > From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > To: <[email protected]> >>> > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 8:36 AM >>> > Subject: Re: Build update, was: SCA source tree and build structure >>> > >>> > >>> > > Bert Lamb wrote: >>> > >> Just to note, in order for this build to work from a fresh empty >>> maven >>> > >> local repo, you'll need to run "mvn" from the > >> >>> /java/spec/sca-api-r1.0 >>> / >>> > >> directory first. >>> > >> >>> > >> -Bert >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > > Good point. I had forgotten to commit my change to >>> java/sca/pom.xml > > to >>> > > include the spec-api in the top-down build. It's now fixed in > >>> > revision >>> > > r525846. >>> > > >>> > > Also, I'm not sure it's obvious to everybody that the SCA API is >>> hiding >>> > > under java/spec instead of being under the java/sca folder. Similar >>> > > comment for the SDO API. >>> > > >>> > > How about moving java/spec/sca-api-r1.0 to java/sca and >>> > > java/spec/sdo-api to java/sdo as well? >>> > > >>> > > Thoughts? >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > Jean-Sebastien >>> > > >>> > > I could be convinced, but I'm not sure I understand yet :) Aren't we going to release an sca-api JAR in our next tuscany-incubating-xyz.tar.gz? -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende
