Ok... this makes sense to me... I'll go ahead and make this change. Thanks :)
- Venkat On 4/10/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Venkata Krishnan wrote: > Hi, > > In the Assembly module can I change the Property interface hierarchy as > follows: > > - Have ComponentProperty extend from AbstractProperty instead of > Property. > - Move the 'defaultValue' accessors into 'Property' from AsbtractProperty > - Introduce accessors for 'value' in ComponentProperty. > > Right now the value for a ComponentProperty gets read into the > 'defaultValue' field and I just want this to move into 'value' field. > > Opinions on this change proposal? Thanks. > > - Venkat > From the SCA assembly spec, it looks like constrainingType/property can specify a value as well, so AbstractProperty needs a way to specify a value. How about just renaming the defaultValue field to value? If we did that then the structure would be similar to References and Services. A Reference can have some characteristics (like targets or bindings) configured in a ComponentType, then reconfigured on a ComponentReference. Similar for Property, the Property could have its value configured in a ComponentType, then reconfigured on a ComponentProperty. -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
