These are done now:
1) Using SDO Java could move to 'user guide' on this page.
+1 2) Code structure can move to get involved or even to the architecture doc +1 to moving to "get involved" On 4/17/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I replied to this thread on the tuscany-user list On 12/04/07, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Kelvin, > Thanks for your review. You mentioned that scopes should be the same when > on a given page. > I agree. I fixed it. We now have a sdo cpp FAQ and a sdo Java FAQ. I > also moved text from some of the mentioned threads to the FAQ. The ones I > did not is because I did not know how to net it down to a question and an > answer. > > You mentioned General heading can be called Tuscany or SDO General > heading. The General heading is more a collection of things that I couldn't > find a good title for on that page :) It is not intended to be general for > Tuscany. > > Some suggestion for the SDO Java page: > > 1) Using SDO Java could move to 'user guide' on this page. > 2) Code structure can move to get involved or even to the architecture doc > > If there is agreement, I go ahead and make the changes. > Haleh > > > On 4/12/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Haleh, > > > > thanks for addressing these issues. One concern I have after a quick > > look > > is that on arriving at a pages such as > > http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/sdo-java.html some of the links on the > > left > > under a given heading go off to a scope that is not intuitive from the > > page > > that you were on. E.g. under the "General" sidebar heading, the FAQ > > link > > for Java SDO goes to a page that I think is intended to contain generic > > cross language SDO questions, i.e. up one level of abstraction from the > > page > > heading. It's been that way since version 3 of the file, and I can't > > work > > out whether it's intended that way, or just a result of copying the > > content > > from an existing C++ page. > > > > The next sidebar heading below FAQ --- "Downloads" --- relates to > > downloading SDO Java (i.e. at the same level of abstraction of the > > current > > page). I think it would be good if the sidebar headings grouped links > > at > > the same level of abstraction and made this clear from the heading name > > - > > e.g. "Tuscany General", or "SDO General" > > > > > > BTW, FWIW, this prompted me to just catalogue the set of tuscany-dev > > notes > > that I have put an "FAQ" label against when reading the list. I had the > > intention of reviewing this list to see what was worth refining into > > well > > formed info snippets some time, but haven't got to it yet. Maybe we > > can > > divide and conquer to add to the website's FAQ set. Does anyone else > > have > > anything like this? > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00469.html > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg13291.html > > Ron Gavlin's response to tuscany-user of 5th of Jan (cant find a very > > good > > archive URL for this one) > > My response to Alexander Pankov of the 26th of Jan on t-user > > (again URL > > not readily found) > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00560.html > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00610.html > > The thread started by Adriano Crestani on 15th Feb "mvn problem?" > > Unanswered thread from Ignacio on 16th Feb > > Frank's responses to Murtaza Goga in the thread started 20th March > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-user/200703.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The thread entitled "Root property that is not containment" started 29th > > of > > Jan > > The thread entitled "Getting started with Tuscany databinding" started > > on > > 10th April > > > > Regards, Kelvin. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/04/07, haleh mahbod < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > As mentioned in [1] I started working on the website and the first > > phase > > > is > > > ready for review. > > > > > > My first attempt ended up with something other than what I had > > originally > > > planned; which was to move content. Instead, I worked on the > > readability > > > of > > > the website. > > > I have tried to use a consistent look and feel across the pages to > > make > > > it > > > easier to find information. In addition, I tried to make > > the information > > > available progressively ( allowing the user to decide if they want to > > > learn > > > more). > > > > > > Here is the layout at a high level for the Tuscany Website ( > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/) > > > > > > - Home page - On this page you will find the general stuff that > > apply > > > to the whole Tuscany as well as links to each subproject and > > Downloads. > > > - Each subproject has an overview page, for example SCA overview > > or > > > DAS overview. On the overview page you find a brief introduction to > > the > > > subproject and links to resources which are introductory > > information on > > > the > > > subproject, for example white papers, articles, webinar links if > > any. > > > - Each subproject also has a more detailed page for those who want > > to > > > get more info about that particular subproject. For example, SCA > > Java, > > > SDO > > > C++, DAS RDB or DAS LDAP. > > > - Each detailed subproject page's navigation bar looks the same and > > > > > provides more detailed information on the project. For example, > > FAQ, > > > Documentation, How to get involved, Downloads, etc. > > > - I tried to keep each page's navigation information to the minimum > > > > > information that is needed for that stage in order to make it > > easier to > > > find > > > information. > > > > > > I'd like your feedback on this phase before we go ahead and put all > > the > > > content in place. > > > - Is the navigation intuitive? > > > - Do we need additional information? > > > > > > If everyone is happy with the look and feel, let's try to keep the > > > consistency across the pages as we add content. > > > > > > For the next step, I am trying to capture content from the old > > website, > > > the > > > old wiki and mailing threads. > > > Please review the content on the overview pages (already there) and > > > correct > > > it if needed. > > > There is a lot to be done and any help or feedback is very welcomed :) > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Haleh > > > > > > [1] - > > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200704.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >
