+1.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: Next release name? (was: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What
should be in it)
+1
As for DAS, as it has dependencies on SDO, I'd propose to follow the same
name convention as SDO, and use beta1 as well.
On 4/24/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
> What are we going to be calling this next SCA release?
>
> We've had M1 and M2 releases, some alpha kernel releases, DAS are
talking
> about an M3 release and SDO is doing an M3 release although there was
> some
> discussion about renaming that to beta1. I think milestone and alpha
> release
> names may discourage people from trying a release as it makes it sound
> unstable. The spec defined SCA APIs are stable now and we're talking
> about
> making stable SPIs for this next release, so the Tuscany externals are
> becoming stable and that sounds better than alpha quality to me.
>
> So how about the next Tuscany SCA release is named beta1? and we could
> try
> to get DAS and SDO to also follow that naming?
>
> Any comments or alternative name suggestions?
>
> ...ant
>
Good idea, beta1 makes sense to me as APIs and SPIs are getting stable,
as is our support for the SCA assembly XML described in the SCA 1.0 spec.
+1 from me.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
