Although I am not a committer, I fully support to release Java SDO because it's stable and almost complete 2.1 spec implementation. Thanks.
+1 Fuhwei Lwo Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A small nit. You first reference link for [5] is to the version previously named [M3]. Here is my +1 On 4/26/07, kelvin goodson wrote: > > Please vote to release the beta1 distribution of Tuscany SDO for Java > > The release candidate RC1 for Tuscany Java SDO beta1 archive distribution > files are posted here at [1] > The maven repository artifacts are posted in a staging repository [2] > The release > audit tool (rat) files and associated exceptions are attached to the jira > under which the release work was done is at [3]. > > The tag for the source code is at [4] > Changes in this release are shown in > [5]< > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.0-incubator-M3/sdo/distribution/RELEASE_NOTES.txt > > > > [1] http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/beta1/RC1/ > [2] http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/repo/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/ > [3] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1171 > [4] > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.0-incubating-beta1/ > [5] > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.0-incubating-beta1/sdo/distribution/RELEASE_NOTES.txt > > Thanks in advance, > Kelvin. >
