On 5/2/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip] Simon Laws wrote: > >> - tuscany-rmi? Should this be a binding >> >> >> Yes, would be better as tuscany-binding-rmi. >> We already have a tuscany-binding-rmi module: the implementation of the RMI binding. The tuscany-rmi module defines an RMI hosting extension point, similar to how the tuscany-http module provides an HTTP host extension point. To make that clear, I'd suggest to rename tuscany-rmi to tuscany-host-rmi and tuscany-http to tuscany-host-http.
+1 to changing to tuscany-host-rmi and tuscany-host-http But we also have a tuscany-host-spi and tuscany-host-embedded which have nothing to do with and aren't used by tuscany-host-rmi and tuscany-host-http, could these be renamed to something like tuscany-host-spi be tuscany-runtime-spi and tuscany-host-embedded be tuscany-runtime-embedded? If there's going to be any module name changes then the package name used withing the module will also have to be renamed right? So how about starting to change things to org.apache.tuscany.sca at the same time? And vaguely related, everywhere we have a dependency on tuscany-host-embedded we also have a dependency on tuscany-implementation-java-runtime, how about to simplify things (eg for the sample pom's) we add tuscany-implementation-java-runtime as a dependency in tuscany-host-embedded? ...ant
